
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TAP Canada &#187; radioactive waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=radioactive-waste" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Tritium Awareness Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 14:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>United States way ahead of Canada on safe disposal of tritium exit signs</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=572</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=572#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaking landfills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As they age, tritium EXIT signs become less effective and more toxic, as the tritium gas inside them is converted to the more toxic oxide form. One sign, thrown into a landfill can create significant groundwater pollution. Various American authorities have recently posted detailed information on the internet about responsible management of  tritium EXIT signs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they age, tritium EXIT signs become less effective and more toxic, as the tritium gas inside them is converted to the more toxic oxide form. One sign, thrown into a landfill can create significant groundwater pollution.</p>
<p>Various American authorities have recently posted detailed information on the internet about responsible management of  tritium EXIT signs. Authorities in the United States appear to be way ahead of their Canadian counterparts in addressing the serious problems created by use and disposal of  these signs, many of which are manufactured in Canada.</p>
<p>In the U.S.,  the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health and Environmental Protection Agency all have prohibited use of tritium signs. Here are two informative web resources created recently by American authorities.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trainex.org/web_courses/tritium/index.htm">1) Responsible Management of tritium EXIT signs<strong> </strong></a>- excellent on-line training module from the Environmental Protection Agency that includes information on health risks, a key to identify tritium signs, recommended alternatives, and safe procedures for disposal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dep.state.pa.us/brp/Radiation_Control_Division/Tritium.htm">2) Bureau of Radiation Protection, State of Pennsylvania</a> - detailed webpage with much information about the problems with tritium exit signs.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">TAP asks </span></strong></span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">&#8220;Where is Canada&#8217;s information on responsibly dealing with tritium exit signs&#8221;</span></strong></span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #993366;">?</span><span style="color: #993366;">  </span></span></strong></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=572</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One tritium exit sign contains enough radiation for a lethal dose</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=556</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=556#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CANDU reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ontario Power Generation sells waste tritium from CANDU reactors to two Ontario companies that manufacture tritium lights,  SRB Technologies in Pembroke and Shield Source in Peterborough. These companies use the tritium to make self-luminous exit signs. TAP believes that the marketing of radioactive waste in these products should be prohibited. Safer, more effective and more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ontario Power Generation sells waste tritium from CANDU reactors to two Ontario companies that manufacture tritium lights,  SRB Technologies in Pembroke and Shield Source in Peterborough. These companies use the tritium to make self-luminous exit signs. TAP believes that the marketing of radioactive waste in these products should be prohibited. Safer, more effective and more energy efficient alternatives are available.</p>
<p>Besides being hazardous during manufacture and disposal, tritium lights and products containing them are hazardous during use. The tritium contained in a single exit sign, if fully oxidized and inhaled would constitute a lethal dose of radiation. Incidents have occurred in the United States where lights have been accidentally or intentionally broken, thus requiring expensive emergency measures including evacuations and decontamination operations.</p>
<p>This and other problems are described in the <a href="http://www.tapcanada.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/problems-with-tritium-exit-signs.pdf">TAP fact sheet</a> &#8220;Problems with tritium exit signs&#8221; available in PDF format for download in the documents section of this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=556</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Used tritium exit signs from Canada causing serious pollution problems around the world</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=551</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaking landfills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many problems with tritium exit signs, as detailed in the TAP fact sheet on this topic. Disposal of waste exit signs can seriously pollute groundwater. Tritium lights become much more hazardous to the environment as they age; the glass tubes act as sponges for tritium, converting it into its more hazardous and soluble [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many problems with tritium exit signs, as detailed in the <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/problems-with-tritium-exit-signs.pdf">TAP fact sheet on this topic</a>.</p>
<p>Disposal of waste exit signs can seriously pollute groundwater. Tritium lights become much more hazardous to the environment as they age; the glass tubes act as sponges for tritium, converting it into its more hazardous and soluble oxidized form. Information linking high levels of tritium oxide in landfill leachate to discarded exit signs, has recently come to light in Scotland, South Africa, Italy and several states in the U.S. Regulators are grappling with the issue of how to ensure that used tritium exit signs go to monitored, radioactive waste storage facilities (1,2). Although no Canadian data are available, the situation may be worse here because regulations allow for disposal of used exit signs in ordinary landfills.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1) <a href="http://search.sepa.org.uk/sepa?action=search&amp;q=tritium%20in%20landfills">Study of tritium in leachate from Scottish landfill sites</a><br />
2) <a href="http://www.dep.state.pa.us/brp/Radiation_Control_Division/Tritium.htm"> State of Pennsylvania</a> Department of Environmental Protection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=551</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The atomic rhubarb of Pembroke</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=437</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tritium-laced plants found near town&#8217;s glow-in-the-dark sign factory MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT Environment Reporter, The Globe and Mail Tuesday, September 28, 1999 Radioactive rhubarb has been found growing in Pembroke, Ont., near a factory that makes glow-in-the-dark signs from nuclear waste. The rhubarb, apparently thriving downwind of the sign factory owned by SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc., contained [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tritium-laced plants found near town&#8217;s glow-in-the-dark sign factory <span><br />
</span>MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT Environment Reporter, The Globe and Mail<span><br />
</span><em>Tuesday, September 28, 1999</em></p>
<p>Radioactive rhubarb has been found growing in Pembroke, Ont., near a factory that makes glow-in-the-dark signs from<span><strong> </strong></span><span><strong>nuclear</strong></span> waste.</p>
<p>The rhubarb, apparently thriving downwind of the sign factory owned by SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc., contained about 1,000 times the radioactive tritium found either in rain water in Ottawa or in a rhubarb sample taken from a garden about 45 kilometres away.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was unusually large rhubarb, but I don&#8217;t think it was mutant or anything like that,&#8221; said Ole Hendrickson, a resident of the Ottawa Valley community who helped collect the samples.<span id="more-437"></span></p>
<p>The Atomic Energy Control Board, the country&#8217;s<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span>-safety agency, said the radioactivity from the rhubarb carries little risk, but Mr. Hendrickson said residents should not have any involuntary exposure to a potentially dangerous radioactive substance. He said regulators &#8220;should be targeting for zero level&#8221; of exposure to radioactive material.</p>
<p>There are no other known sources of tritium in Pembroke, such as atomic power stations or<span> </span><span>nuclear</span>-weapon-manufacturing facilities, making fugitive emissions from the sign plant the only likely source. The company makes signs that are illuminated without electricity, such as airport runway markers and exit signs.</p>
<p>The tritium concentrations were about 19 to 75 times the average levels found in plants growing around Ontario&#8217;s three<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> stations. The generating stations are far larger than the sign plant, which is in a small industrial building on the outskirts of Pembroke.</p>
<p>The AECB views the radioactive rhubarb as safe enough to be baked in pies or made into jam.</p>
<p>Sunni Locatelli, a board spokeswoman, said consuming the rhubarb would deliver a weak radioactive dose far lower than that from a chest X-ray or from living in a brick house, two other things that lead to small extra doses of radiation.</p>
<p>The emissions from the rhubarb are &#8220;well below the public dose limits,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>The company said it is in compliance with all the conditions of its operating licence. &#8220;We meet the guidelines set by the Atomic Energy Control Board,&#8221; SRB executive Stephane Levesque said.</p>
<p>Mr. Hendrickson had the rhubarb sent to a laboratory at the University of Waterloo, which detected the high concentration.</p>
<p>The laboratory then refused to analyze a second plant sample &#8212; of an aspen leaf from a tree growing next to the sign factory &#8212; because of concern over the tritium levels in the rhubarb.</p>
<p>University officials were worried that if a worker accidentally broke a sample containing such a high level of tritium, its laboratory would be contaminated.</p>
<p>The Waterloo lab specializes in checking for minute traces of tritium in groundwater, which typically has radiation amounts about one-thousandth those of the Pembroke rhubarb. Staff were worried that an accident would irradiate instruments and undermine the accuracy of future test results.</p>
<p>A spill in the lab &#8220;might cause us a lot of grief,&#8221; said manager Robert Drimmie, adding that he did not refuse the second sample because of worries over the potential health risk.</p>
<p>Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen used mainly to make thermonuclear bombs. But it can also be used in glow-in-the-dark signs.</p>
<p>Tritium is produced as an unwanted byproduct of Canadian-designed<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> reactors. SRB makes its signs using tritium from Ontario Power Generation Inc. and from tritium recycled from old glow-in-the-dark signs.</p>
<p>Canada has no standards for tritium contamination in food, Ms. Locatelli said, but regulators try to minimize exposure to all sources of human-caused radioactivity because it is a carcinogen and causes genetic damage.</p>
<p>There is no safe radiation dose, but the new federal regulatory standard for public exposure to human sources of radioactivity accepts as a safe risk<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> contamination that causes 50 additional people in a population of one million to die of cancer.</p>
<p>The AECB says the sign plant is well within this safety standard.</p>
<p>SRB conducts its own testing for radiation in vegetation around the plant, but Mr. Levesque declined to divulge the results.</p>
<p>The rhubarb Mr. Hendrickson sent for analysis contained 2,000 becquerels per litre of tritium. A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity.</p>
<p>The Ontario drinking-water guideline for tritium is to allow no more than 7,000 Bq per litre. In the mid 1990s, a provincial advisory body recommended a more stringent safety standard of 100 Bq per litre, but the proposal was never adopted by the government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=437</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lights out for glow-in-the-dark sign factory</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=447</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=447#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Globe and Mail Pembroke facility shuts down operations temporarily amid radioactivity concerns By MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT Thursday, December 1, 2005 A company that contaminated groundwater around its plant in Pembroke, Ont., with radioactive tritium says it has halted operations and will not resume manufacturing until it puts in place better pollution controls. SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globe and Mail</p>
<p>Pembroke facility shuts down operations temporarily amid<br />
radioactivity concerns</p>
<p>By MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT<br />
Thursday, December 1, 2005</p>
<p>A company that contaminated groundwater around its plant in Pembroke, Ont., with radioactive tritium says it has halted operations and will not resume manufacturing until it puts in place better pollution controls.</p>
<p>SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc. announced its temporary shutdown in an e-mail sent late Tuesday night to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, the country&#8217;s nuclear watchdog agency. The letter was sent just before the company was scheduled to appear at a CNSC hearing yesterday into the future of the plant.<span id="more-447"></span></p>
<p>The company is a manufacturer of glow-in-the-dark signs, such as emergency-exit markers, which run without electricity. It makes the signs using tritium, a waste product taken from Ontario&#8217;s nuclear-power plants.</p>
<p>Last month, staff at the commission recommended the plant be closed after they discovered the company was not able to provide reliable estimates on the amount of radioactivity being released into Pembroke, an Ottawa River community of 15,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=447</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
