
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TAP Canada &#187; pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=pollution" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>Tritium Awareness Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 14:36:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SSI announces possible error in tritium emission calculations</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=941</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=941#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shield Source Incorporated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapcanada.org/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This public notice,  posted recently on the SSI website, is eerily reminiscent of a similar event several years ago in Pembroke when SRB Technologies Inc. discovered a 10-fold underestimation of its tritium emissions that had been ongoing for many years: (From the Website of Shield Source Incorporated on April 8, 2012) &#8220;PUBLIC NOTICE &#8211; APRIL 2012 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This public notice,  posted recently on the SSI website, is eerily reminiscent of a similar event several years ago in Pembroke when SRB Technologies Inc. discovered a 10-fold underestimation of its tritium emissions that had been ongoing for many years:</p>
<p>(From the Website of Shield Source Incorporated on April 8, 2012)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;PUBLIC NOTICE &#8211; APRIL 2012</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>On March 28, 2012, we suspended operations to investigate potential errors in calculated HT emission data.  HT is tritium gas that is emitted in small quantities from our exhaust stack during our production process.  The CNSC was notified of this decision on the same day.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>After consultation with independent consultants and the CNSC, we have decided to hire a third party consultant to install a parallel monitoring system to verify emission data during a limited production three day test scheduled to commence on April 3rd. Based on the values under consideration, this is not considered a threat to the public.  Verified independent environmental sampling of air, water, and vegetation remains at historically safe levels.  Additional information will be posted on this website as soon as it’s available.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Note that SSI refers to &#8220;small quantities of tritium gas&#8221; being emitted from its exhaust stack. In fact, the tritium light factories, SSI in Peterborough, Ontario and SRB Technologies in Pembroke, Ontario are the two largest point sources for tritium gas emissions in the world, as far as we are aware.</strong></span></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=941</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risks of tritium on health could be underestimated &#8211; Le Monde</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=892</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=892#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tapcanada.org/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director General of the French nuclear regulator, Autorite de Surete Nucleaire, Jean-Christophe Niel, calls on nuclear operators to control their tritium emissions in this article from Le Monde dated July 8, 2010. The risks of tritium on health could be underestimated The risks of tritium &#8211; the radioactive form of hydrogen &#8211; could be undervalued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Director General of the French nuclear regulator, Autorite de Surete Nucleaire, Jean-Christophe Niel, calls on nuclear operators to control their tritium emissions in this article from Le Monde dated July 8, 2010.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The risks of tritium on health could be underestimated</span></p>
<p>The risks of tritium &#8211; the radioactive form of hydrogen &#8211; could be undervalued because it could be bound into the DNA of cells, according to experts who participated in a White Paper published on Thursday July 8 by the French Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN). <span id="more-892"></span>In France, the overall impact of tritium releases is low however: ASN officials emphasized at the outset of the press conference: the average annual dose is a thousand times smaller than the threshold limit of 1 mSv, a unit which measures its radioactive effects in the human body.</p>
<p>Tritium is a radioactive element considered &#8220;slightly toxic&#8221; if one takes into account the average energy deposited in a body, said Dr Patrick Smeesters of the Belgian Federal Agency for Nuclear Control who chaired various &#8220;thinking groups” created at the initiative of the ASN in 2009. But tritium may be combined with certain cellular components, even DNA, said the expert noting reports of tritium measurements made in the UK, including Sellafield, which has a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. &#8220;In Cardiff Bay, the tritium concentration in marine fauna is 1,000-10,000 times that of seawater&#8221; he said. At Cardiff, &#8220;organic molecules containing tritium were released into the sea&#8221; which may explain this concentration. &#8220;In the case of Sellafield, tritium concentrations in marine fauna concentration were only increased by a factor of 10, but only tritiated water was released.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hence his questions: it is assumed that the nuclear plants release only tritiated water, but what is the real nature of their tritium releases? Do marine micro-organisms play a role in the accumulation of tritium? Tritium, when released as tritiated water, would then be ingested by animals and integrated into complex biological molecules. In an embryo with only a few cells, such organic compounds containing tritium could integrate with their DNA and may cause mutations.</p>
<p>Faced with these issues, the Director-General of the Autorite de Surete Nucleaire (ASN), Jean-Christophe Niel, wants the investigation &#8220;on new approaches in relation to possible hereditary effects”. After the publication of the White Paper of tritium, the ASN intends to establish a &#8220;monitoring committee&#8221; and calls on nuclear operators to control their (tritium) emissions. ASN’s action plan also provides for the monitoring of various forms of tritium in the environment and for assessing their impact.</p>
<p>________________________________________________________________</p>
<h1><span style="font-size: medium;">Les risques du tritium sur la santé pourraient être sous-évalués </span></h1>
<h1 lang="fr-FR"><span style="font-size: medium;">AFP | 08.07.10 | 20h15</span></h1>
<p>Les risques du tritium forme radioactive de l&#8217;hydrogène &#8211; pourraient être sous-évalués car il pourrait s&#8217;intégrer à l&#8217;ADN au coeur des cellules, selon des experts ayant participé à un Livre Blanc publié jeudi par l&#8217;Autorité de sûreté nucléaire. En France, l&#8217;impact global des rejets de tritium est faible, ont cependant tenu à souligner d&#8217;emblée les responsables de l&#8217;ASN lors d&#8217;une conférence de presse: la dose moyenne annuelle est mille fois inférieure au seuil limite de 1 millisievert, une unité prenant en compte les effets sur le corps humain de la radioactivité. Le tritium est un radio-élément considéré &#8220;peu toxique&#8221; si l&#8217;on prend en compte l&#8217;énergie moyenne déposée dans un organe, a expliqué Patrick Smeesters, de l&#8217;Agence fédérale de contrôle nucléaire belge, qui a présidé un des &#8220;groupes de réflexion&#8221; créés à l&#8217;initiative de l&#8217;ASN. Mais lorsqu&#8217;il est associé à certains composants des cellules, il peut agir au coeur même de d&#8217;ADN, a souligné cet expert faisant état de mesures effectuées en Grande-Bretagne, notamment à Sellafield, où se trouve une usine de retraitement de combustibles nucléaires. &#8220;Dans la baie de Cardiff, la concentration en tritium dans la faune marine est 1.000 à 10.000 fois supérieure à celle de l&#8217;eau de mer&#8221;, a-t-il expliqué. Alors qu&#8217;à Cardiff, &#8220;des molécules complexes contenant du tritium étaient rejetées dans la mer&#8221;, ce qui peut expliquer cette concentration, &#8220;dans le cas de Sellafield, l&#8217;augmentation de concentration n&#8217;est que d&#8217;un facteur 10, mais seulement de l&#8217;eau tritiée (avec du tritium) était rejetée&#8221;. D&#8217;où ses interrogations : on présume que les centrales ne rejettent de l&#8217;eau tritiée, qu&#8217;en est-il de la nature réelle des rejets? Est-ce que les microorganismes marins ne jouent pas un rôle dans l&#8217;accumulation du tritium? Cet isotope de l&#8217;hydrogène rejeté sous forme d&#8217;eau tritiée serait ensuite ingéré par les animaux et intégré à des molécules biologiques complexes. Pour un embryon de quelques cellules seulement, de tels composés organiques à base de tritium s&#8217;intégrant à leur ADN risquent de provoquer des mutations. Face à ces questions, le directeur général de l&#8217;ASN Jean-Christophe Niel, souhaite des investigations &#8220;sur de nouvelles approches par rapport à d&#8217;éventuels effets héréditaires&#8221;. Après la publication du &#8220;Livre blanc du tritium&#8221;, l&#8217;ASN entend mettre un place un &#8220;comité de suivi&#8221; et invite les exploitants d&#8217;installations nucléaires à maîtriser leurs rejets. Son plan d&#8217;action prévoit aussi la surveillance du des différentes formes de tritium dans l&#8217;environnement et l&#8217;évaluation de leur impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=892</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNSC staff recommend a new 5-year license for SRBT</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=840</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SRB Technologies has applied to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) for a new five-year license to process tritium at its manufacturing facility in Pembroke Ontario, site of the worst environmental tritium contamination in Canada owing to the SRB&#8217;s past activities.  CNSC staff recommends that the Commission grant SRB a licence to discharge tritium in amounts up to 448 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SRB Technologies has applied to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) for a new five-year license to process tritium at its manufacturing facility in Pembroke Ontario, site of the worst environmental tritium contamination in Canada owing to the SRB&#8217;s past activities. </p>
<p>CNSC staff recommends that the Commission grant SRB a licence to discharge tritium in amounts up to 448 trillion becquerels per year through its stacks and 200 billion becquerels per year into the municipal sewer system.</p>
<p>At a one-day public hearing on May 19th intervenors included Concerned Citizens of Renfrew County, The First Six Years, the International Institute of Concern for Public Health, Prevent Cancer Now,  and the Council of Canadians. Many concerns and problems were highlighted, for example: serious groundwater pollution, proximity to residential neighbourhoods, radioactive waste disposal issues and funding for decommissioning.</p>
<p>If CNSC follows its usual pattern, a decision to approve this license application will be announced in the late afternoon on June 30th, the day that SRB&#8217;s current licence expires, and the day before the Canada Day holiday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=840</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tritium on Tap report</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=806</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=806#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sierra Club of Canada has released a new report on tritium in Canadian drinking water. The report is entitled &#8220;Tritium on Tap&#8221;. It documents the massive quantities of radioactive tritium released into drinking water sources by the nuclear industry in Canada on a routine basis. A copy of the report is available for downloading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sierra Club of Canada has released a new report on tritium in Canadian drinking water. The report is entitled &#8220;Tritium on Tap&#8221;. It documents the massive quantities of radioactive tritium released into drinking water sources by the nuclear industry in Canada on a routine basis.</p>
<p>A copy of the report is available for downloading in the documents section of this website and at the <a href="http://www.sierraclub.ca/national/tritium_report.shtml">Sierra Club of Canada site.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=806</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Serious tritium pollution in Peterborough, Ontario</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=750</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serious tritium pollution has recently come to light in the vicinity of Shield Source Incorporated, a tritium sign factory near the Peterborough airport. The company has applied for a five year extension of its existing license. The application will be considered at a public hearing at the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in Ottawa on June [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serious tritium pollution has recently come to light in the vicinity of Shield Source Incorporated, a tritium sign factory near the Peterborough airport. The company has applied for a five year extension of its existing license. The application will be considered at a public hearing at the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in Ottawa on June 10th. </p>
<p>Documents filed for the hearing show tritium contamination at the base of SSI&#8217;s stacks has exceeded 1,000,000 Becquerels per litre. Local apples and groundwater wells are contaminated at many times higher than background levels. </p>
<p> SSI&#8217;s current license permits it to release 34,000 quadrillion becquerels of tritium. This is an unbelievably large quantity. So large it&#8217;s hard to put into words. But suffice it to say that SSI&#8217;s current license permits it to release more than the current total global inventory of tritium.<span id="more-750"></span></p>
<p>Of course SSI&#8217;s actual tritium releases are only a small fraction of their allowable limit*. But a small fraction of an enormous number can still be a large amount.</p>
<p>This is all eerily familiar. Citizens of Pembroke have been through this with our own tritium sign factory, SRB Technologies Incorporated. Soil and groundwater in the vicinity of SRB remain highly contaminated with tritium and nearby residents have stopped growing vegetables for home consumption. Some still grow a few veggies to use for monitoring tritium contamination every year.</p>
<p>Members of the Tritium Awareness Project will be intervening in the licensing hearing for SSI on June 10th. Members of the public who are interested in intervening must contact the CNSC  by May 13th. Details for intervenors are available on the CNSC website at <a href="http://www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/">www.cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca/eng/</a></p>
<p>Members of the public can also sign and/or collect signatures on the TAP petition to phase out the use of tritium lights. The petition is located <a href="http://www.tapcanada.org/en/petition/">here.</a></p>
<p>* due to the CNSC&#8217;s strange practice of setting allowable limits more than a thousand times higher than actual releases, an approach that is contrary to guidance from the International Atomic Energy Agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=750</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States way ahead of Canada on safe disposal of tritium exit signs</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=572</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=572#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaking landfills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As they age, tritium EXIT signs become less effective and more toxic, as the tritium gas inside them is converted to the more toxic oxide form. One sign, thrown into a landfill can create significant groundwater pollution. Various American authorities have recently posted detailed information on the internet about responsible management of  tritium EXIT signs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they age, tritium EXIT signs become less effective and more toxic, as the tritium gas inside them is converted to the more toxic oxide form. One sign, thrown into a landfill can create significant groundwater pollution.</p>
<p>Various American authorities have recently posted detailed information on the internet about responsible management of  tritium EXIT signs. Authorities in the United States appear to be way ahead of their Canadian counterparts in addressing the serious problems created by use and disposal of  these signs, many of which are manufactured in Canada.</p>
<p>In the U.S.,  the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health and Environmental Protection Agency all have prohibited use of tritium signs. Here are two informative web resources created recently by American authorities.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trainex.org/web_courses/tritium/index.htm">1) Responsible Management of tritium EXIT signs<strong> </strong></a>- excellent on-line training module from the Environmental Protection Agency that includes information on health risks, a key to identify tritium signs, recommended alternatives, and safe procedures for disposal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dep.state.pa.us/brp/Radiation_Control_Division/Tritium.htm">2) Bureau of Radiation Protection, State of Pennsylvania</a> - detailed webpage with much information about the problems with tritium exit signs.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">TAP asks </span></strong></span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">&#8220;Where is Canada&#8217;s information on responsibly dealing with tritium exit signs&#8221;</span></strong></span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #800000;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="color: #993366;">?</span><span style="color: #993366;">  </span></span></strong></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=572</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Used tritium exit signs from Canada causing serious pollution problems around the world</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=551</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=551#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaking landfills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many problems with tritium exit signs, as detailed in the TAP fact sheet on this topic. Disposal of waste exit signs can seriously pollute groundwater. Tritium lights become much more hazardous to the environment as they age; the glass tubes act as sponges for tritium, converting it into its more hazardous and soluble [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many problems with tritium exit signs, as detailed in the <a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/problems-with-tritium-exit-signs.pdf">TAP fact sheet on this topic</a>.</p>
<p>Disposal of waste exit signs can seriously pollute groundwater. Tritium lights become much more hazardous to the environment as they age; the glass tubes act as sponges for tritium, converting it into its more hazardous and soluble oxidized form. Information linking high levels of tritium oxide in landfill leachate to discarded exit signs, has recently come to light in Scotland, South Africa, Italy and several states in the U.S. Regulators are grappling with the issue of how to ensure that used tritium exit signs go to monitored, radioactive waste storage facilities (1,2). Although no Canadian data are available, the situation may be worse here because regulations allow for disposal of used exit signs in ordinary landfills.</p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>1) <a href="http://search.sepa.org.uk/sepa?action=search&amp;q=tritium%20in%20landfills">Study of tritium in leachate from Scottish landfill sites</a><br />
2) <a href="http://www.dep.state.pa.us/brp/Radiation_Control_Division/Tritium.htm"> State of Pennsylvania</a> Department of Environmental Protection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=551</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A series of stories about SRB Technologies from the archives</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=495</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=495#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CANDU reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have just posted several archival news stories here on the TAP website,  dealing with tritium pollution from SRB Technologies Inc. in Pembroke, Ontario. This story is incredible but true.  SRB  was licensed by the Atomic Energy Control Board (now the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) in 1990  to market a radioactive waste byproduct of CANDU reactors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have just posted several archival news stories here on the TAP website,  dealing with tritium pollution from SRB Technologies Inc. in Pembroke, Ontario. This story is incredible but true. </p>
<p>SRB  was licensed by the Atomic Energy Control Board (now the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) in 1990  to market a radioactive waste byproduct of CANDU reactors called tritium &#8212; a radioactive form of hydrogen. SRB makes self-illuminating signs &#8212; they glow in the dark because they are filled with large quantities of radioactive tritium gas.  </p>
<p>Over the years. SRB has contaminated the environment in Pembroke with high levels of tritium. In some years, more tritium was given off into the environment by the SRB plant than by all of Canada&#8217;s nuclear power reactors combined. <strong> <span style="font-weight: normal;">Meanwhile, SRB is exporting tritium contamination problems around the world because there is no effective control over the ultimate disposal of these radioactive signs. </span></strong></p>
<p>This story is replete with patent examples of regulatory incompetence, murky questions about nuclear weapons and international security risks (because tritium is also used as a nuclear explosive material) and salt-of-the-earth folks being treated with disregard and exposed to high levels of radioactive tritium for  almost 20 years with no end in sight.  Please see also the “personal stories” category for more about this.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="color: #b8860b;"><span style="color: #33cccc;"><span style="color: #993366;">TAP feels that the marketing of radioactive wastes like tritium should be banned in Canada, and the SRB plant should be permanently shut down</span><span style="color: #993366;">. </span></span></span></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=495</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The atomic rhubarb of Pembroke</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=437</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glow-in-the-dark signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tritium-laced plants found near town&#8217;s glow-in-the-dark sign factory MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT Environment Reporter, The Globe and Mail Tuesday, September 28, 1999 Radioactive rhubarb has been found growing in Pembroke, Ont., near a factory that makes glow-in-the-dark signs from nuclear waste. The rhubarb, apparently thriving downwind of the sign factory owned by SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc., contained [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tritium-laced plants found near town&#8217;s glow-in-the-dark sign factory <span><br />
</span>MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT Environment Reporter, The Globe and Mail<span><br />
</span><em>Tuesday, September 28, 1999</em></p>
<p>Radioactive rhubarb has been found growing in Pembroke, Ont., near a factory that makes glow-in-the-dark signs from<span><strong> </strong></span><span><strong>nuclear</strong></span> waste.</p>
<p>The rhubarb, apparently thriving downwind of the sign factory owned by SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc., contained about 1,000 times the radioactive tritium found either in rain water in Ottawa or in a rhubarb sample taken from a garden about 45 kilometres away.</p>
<p>&#8220;It was unusually large rhubarb, but I don&#8217;t think it was mutant or anything like that,&#8221; said Ole Hendrickson, a resident of the Ottawa Valley community who helped collect the samples.<span id="more-437"></span></p>
<p>The Atomic Energy Control Board, the country&#8217;s<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span>-safety agency, said the radioactivity from the rhubarb carries little risk, but Mr. Hendrickson said residents should not have any involuntary exposure to a potentially dangerous radioactive substance. He said regulators &#8220;should be targeting for zero level&#8221; of exposure to radioactive material.</p>
<p>There are no other known sources of tritium in Pembroke, such as atomic power stations or<span> </span><span>nuclear</span>-weapon-manufacturing facilities, making fugitive emissions from the sign plant the only likely source. The company makes signs that are illuminated without electricity, such as airport runway markers and exit signs.</p>
<p>The tritium concentrations were about 19 to 75 times the average levels found in plants growing around Ontario&#8217;s three<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> stations. The generating stations are far larger than the sign plant, which is in a small industrial building on the outskirts of Pembroke.</p>
<p>The AECB views the radioactive rhubarb as safe enough to be baked in pies or made into jam.</p>
<p>Sunni Locatelli, a board spokeswoman, said consuming the rhubarb would deliver a weak radioactive dose far lower than that from a chest X-ray or from living in a brick house, two other things that lead to small extra doses of radiation.</p>
<p>The emissions from the rhubarb are &#8220;well below the public dose limits,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>The company said it is in compliance with all the conditions of its operating licence. &#8220;We meet the guidelines set by the Atomic Energy Control Board,&#8221; SRB executive Stephane Levesque said.</p>
<p>Mr. Hendrickson had the rhubarb sent to a laboratory at the University of Waterloo, which detected the high concentration.</p>
<p>The laboratory then refused to analyze a second plant sample &#8212; of an aspen leaf from a tree growing next to the sign factory &#8212; because of concern over the tritium levels in the rhubarb.</p>
<p>University officials were worried that if a worker accidentally broke a sample containing such a high level of tritium, its laboratory would be contaminated.</p>
<p>The Waterloo lab specializes in checking for minute traces of tritium in groundwater, which typically has radiation amounts about one-thousandth those of the Pembroke rhubarb. Staff were worried that an accident would irradiate instruments and undermine the accuracy of future test results.</p>
<p>A spill in the lab &#8220;might cause us a lot of grief,&#8221; said manager Robert Drimmie, adding that he did not refuse the second sample because of worries over the potential health risk.</p>
<p>Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen used mainly to make thermonuclear bombs. But it can also be used in glow-in-the-dark signs.</p>
<p>Tritium is produced as an unwanted byproduct of Canadian-designed<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> reactors. SRB makes its signs using tritium from Ontario Power Generation Inc. and from tritium recycled from old glow-in-the-dark signs.</p>
<p>Canada has no standards for tritium contamination in food, Ms. Locatelli said, but regulators try to minimize exposure to all sources of human-caused radioactivity because it is a carcinogen and causes genetic damage.</p>
<p>There is no safe radiation dose, but the new federal regulatory standard for public exposure to human sources of radioactivity accepts as a safe risk<span><strong> </strong></span><span>nuclear</span> contamination that causes 50 additional people in a population of one million to die of cancer.</p>
<p>The AECB says the sign plant is well within this safety standard.</p>
<p>SRB conducts its own testing for radiation in vegetation around the plant, but Mr. Levesque declined to divulge the results.</p>
<p>The rhubarb Mr. Hendrickson sent for analysis contained 2,000 becquerels per litre of tritium. A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity.</p>
<p>The Ontario drinking-water guideline for tritium is to allow no more than 7,000 Bq per litre. In the mid 1990s, a provincial advisory body recommended a more stringent safety standard of 100 Bq per litre, but the proposal was never adopted by the government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=437</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High levels of tritium contamination found in samples from Pembroke</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=453</link>
		<comments>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=453#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tap-canada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SRB Technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/en/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT, ENVIRONMENT REPORTER, The Globe and Mail November 12, 1999 Radioactive matter shows up in rink ice, cucumbers, and woman&#8217;s urine High levels of radioactive tritium are being found throughout Pembroke, the site of a plant that recycles the waste material to make glow-in-the-dark signs. Tritium has been discovered in the ice of a local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT, ENVIRONMENT REPORTER, The Globe and Mail<br />
<em>November 12, 1999</em></p>
<p>Radioactive matter shows up in rink ice, cucumbers, and woman&#8217;s urine</p>
<p>High levels of radioactive tritium are being found throughout Pembroke, the site of a plant that recycles the waste material to make glow-in-the-dark signs. Tritium has been discovered in the ice of a local hockey rink, in cucumbers and in the urine of one of the residents of the Ottawa River Valley city.</p>
<p>Although the tritium levels that were found were up to 1,500 times higher than the concentrations in rainwater, the Atomic Energy Control Board says they pose negligible risk of causing cancer.<span id="more-453"></span></p>
<p>Despite the assurances of the country&#8217;s nuclear watchdog agency, Kelly O&#8217;Grady, whose garden contained the radioactive cucumber, says she no longer wants to eat the food from her garden or feed it to her children.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s safe to be eating vegetables from our garden any more. We feel that our rights have been violated, that we should be able to plant a tritium-free garden,&#8221; Ms. O&#8217;Grady said.</p>
<p>The urine and cucumber samples were tested by Pembroke residents worried about emissions from the sign factory, owned by SRB Technologies (Canada) Inc., but it was the AECB that tested tritium levels in the ice rink, swimming pool water, and soil and vegetation throughout the community, including the local tourist bureau.</p>
<p>Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen and is an unwanted waste product of Canadian nuclear reactors. It has commercial applications for use in signs that glow in the dark without electricity, such as exit signs, but it is also a key component of thermonuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Tritium is considered by scientists to be the least dangerous reactor waste, but there is controversy over what constitutes safe levels, with some experts advising tighter standards, particularly for pregnant women.</p>
<p>SRB Technologies has said in a written statement that it operates &#8220;well within&#8221; the guidelines and regulations set up by the AECB and has processes in place to ensure that staff and the public are not at risk.</p>
<p>The woman who had her urine analyzed asked not to be identified.</p>
<p>In response to concerns about tritium releases, which made headlines earlier this year when radioactive rhubarb was found in the city, the control board conducted extensive sampling of soil and vegetation in Pembroke last month and in early November. Results of the testing were presented to residents and politicians on Monday evening.</p>
<p>The testing by both the board and local residents indicates tritium well above normal background levels in many parts of Pembroke, with the highest readings close to the factory. The ice, for instance, was tested at an arena a few hundred metres from the sign plant.</p>
<p>Patsy Thompson, head of the AECB&#8217;s radiological-protection section, said the readings around the sign plant are in line with the radioactivity levels the board would expect for the area, based on the amount of tritium the facility emits during normal operations.</p>
<p>Many residents want the plant to eliminate these discharges, but Ms. Thompson said the board doesn&#8217;t try to force nuclear operators to eliminate all radioactive emissions.</p>
<p>&#8220;The AECB does not regulate facilities such as SRB and others on the basis of zero discharge,&#8221; she said, but added that it tries to ensure that fugitive radioactive emissions are kept at low enough levels to ensure the number of cancer cases stays within the normal range.</p>
<p>She said the radioactivity that Pembroke residents receive from the plant shouldn&#8217;t be a cancer worry because the amounts are at low levels.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>TRITIUM LEVELS IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>While the current Ontario safety guideline for drinking water </strong>        </p>
<p><strong>stands at 7,000 becquerels per liter, a provincial advisory group </strong></p>
<p><strong>suggested levels should be no higher than 100 becquerels per litre.</strong></p>
<p><strong>A becquerel is a unit of radioactivity;</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>it represents one radioactive event per second.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>BECQUERELS PER LITRE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Pembroke urine sample</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>590</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Ice from Pembroke arena</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>3,000</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Pembroke cucumber</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>580</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Pembroke rhubarb</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>2,000</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Pembroke resident&#8217;s </strong>        </p>
<p><strong>swimming pool</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>220</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Average in plants around </strong>        </p>
<p><strong>Pickering nuclear station</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>104</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Average in plants around </strong>        </p>
<p><strong>Bruce nuclear station</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>48</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Average in plants around </strong>        </p>
<p><strong>Darlington nuclear station</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>23</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle"><strong>Ottawa rainwater</strong></td>
<td valign="middle"><strong>2</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Source: Atomic Energy Control Board</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=453</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
