
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tritium in our drinking water: the tip of the radioactive iceberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=194</link>
	<description>Tritium Awareness Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Seitz</title>
		<link>http://tapcanada.org/wordpress/?p=194#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Seitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tapcanada.org/?p=194#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Dear Readers;
And all the media can voice is the tritium discharges from the Chalk River reactor. 
Comparing the Chalk River reactor to a Candu reactor is like comparing a mouse to an elephant.
Candu reactors are notorious for discharging tritium into their environs. They are unable to contain it. Our public utilities are unable to filter it.
 
About Candus, where are our media voices now? Mediated I guess!
 
Unlike public renewable energy discussions we never had nor have we now, a voice in the Candu decidings. 
 
Darlington is seeking our tax dollars for two more Candu reactors.
 
Pickering wants to refurbish their prematurely worn out Candus with even more tax dollars.
 
And who is going to pay to clean up their doo doo? Another doo doo surcharge?
 
We are already surcharged for their operation now.
 
I guess even Candus get cancer, our destiny too unless we unless we find our voices now.
 
NO MORE NUKES! They have fed from our tax trough for over 40 years, far, far too long now. 
 
Sincerely
 
Tim Seitz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Readers;<br />
And all the media can voice is the tritium discharges from the Chalk River reactor.<br />
Comparing the Chalk River reactor to a Candu reactor is like comparing a mouse to an elephant.<br />
Candu reactors are notorious for discharging tritium into their environs. They are unable to contain it. Our public utilities are unable to filter it.</p>
<p>About Candus, where are our media voices now? Mediated I guess!</p>
<p>Unlike public renewable energy discussions we never had nor have we now, a voice in the Candu decidings. </p>
<p>Darlington is seeking our tax dollars for two more Candu reactors.</p>
<p>Pickering wants to refurbish their prematurely worn out Candus with even more tax dollars.</p>
<p>And who is going to pay to clean up their doo doo? Another doo doo surcharge?</p>
<p>We are already surcharged for their operation now.</p>
<p>I guess even Candus get cancer, our destiny too unless we unless we find our voices now.</p>
<p>NO MORE NUKES! They have fed from our tax trough for over 40 years, far, far too long now. </p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>Tim Seitz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
